Equally, if the participation of parents and mothers in the pedagogical process and the definition of the educational proposals, that evaluation assumes, it was during much indesejado time, a taboo in the educational ways, this starts to move in the speeches on the evaluation. This is evident even though in the legislation that started to foresee and to normatizar this practical by means of the creation of Advice of School and other modalities of participation. Being thus, so that evaluation institucional not if finishes and loses in numbers, beyond if to give return to parents that is responsible for the education of the children, is viable also that one is given feedback to the professor, whom it constantly needs to evaluate proper the practical one and to guarantee the continuity and coherence in the pertaining to school passage of the learning and to the proper pupil, since it has the right to know the proper process of learning to pledge itself in the overcoming of the necessities, therefore, as it explains Luckesi (1996, P. 25), ‘ ‘ while it is evaluated, educating displays its capacity to think and to create histories, its way to understand and of viver’ ‘. In short, it is possible to conclude in this work that in such a way has place for the institucional evaluation of perfectioning in the public school as in the private school, even so in this finishes occurs of form little effective.
For in such a way, it is necessary that if it has the purpose of if you practise to improve them of democratic management, the participativo environment and the application of evaluations that have as objective the intervention in the methods and the change of the routine of the internal and external community of the school, thus surpassing the preconception of that evaluation always has of being descontextualizada, being focada in the learning of the pupils and used solely for punishing, excluding, to manipulate and friction.