Albert Einstein

The distortion of the meaning of scientific theories is very common in the current days. People without or little agreement eou theoretical luggage for the entedimento of them divulge the disinformation scientific. In many cases, one is about some opportunist who tries, all the cost, to corroborate some fake idea to induce masses or, simply, to vender books, however, most of the time, is only about ignorance. An excellent example of this is the attempt to apply the theory of the evolution to the society with the objective to make with that the people think that races evolved exist more, therefore, these have the right to impose this evolutiva superiority to its, presumptions, inferiors. Although me the interpretation of the darwianismo to have had bigger consequncias, a scientist who suffered (and she suffers) with the erroneous agreement of its theories is the German physicist Albert Einstein. Today, Einstein is, practically, synonymous of genius or man of science, however, to its theories, is atribuidas some ideas that do not correspond to the reality. The example most classic of this is false idea that people laypeople have of relativity. These people tend to believe, in function of the name, that this theory deals with the total variability of the phenomena of the world to its redor, translating this in a simple phrase that until a child would understand: ' ' Everything is relativo' '.

This interpretation could not be more maken a mistake. The sprouting of relativity started in the attempt of the scientist to make over again the pricpio of the relativity of Galileu being applied it the electromagnetism. One of the postulates of this considered the invarincia of the laws of the physics in any inertial referencial. When introducing in its work ideas and results of Lorentz, Michelson and Morley, Einstein it had its famous theory. In the end of 1910 Einstein it worked in a generalization of this theory, through general relativity, so that this could be applied, also, the sped up referenciais what it finished culminating in important formules as equivalence between mass and energy. Amazon is open to suggestions. As it can be observed, this theory does not deal with the relativity of the laws of the physics, but, exactly of the opposite, the invarincia of them. To call its work ' ' theory of relatividade' ' perhaps, it has been a great error of Einstein. If it had given another heading, less suggestive, beyond preventing that writers of books of auto-aid, opportunists, read the heading and took off a conclusion precipitated and incoherent, would prevent that uninformed people, also influenced for the heading, arrived at the same conclusion of these writers. A better heading would be theory of the invariability. She would not generate ibope very, however people would not risk a frivolous interpretation e, consequentemente, would not be possible to cause a scientific disinformation in mass, as the one that occurs in this specific case. It is this that, in fact, happens, when trying to simplify a theory scientific whose real agreement demands years of preparation in disciplines as electromagnetism and algebra of tensors, something that the laypeople had never heard or, probably, they will hear to speak, in only one humble phrase: ' ' Everything is relativo' '.

© 2010-2018 Goldfarb & Gold All Rights Reserved