United States Government
Let’s look at another extract from the article: the surveyed firms noted that it is too early to comment on the levels of remuneration for 2010. Many explained that if not properly pay their employees, they risk losing the best. Many people may ask: why the Government is not acting? No matter what others do, the State’s wealth is an internal condition. The rich man is rich, because he knows that he is rich. Let’s look at another extract from the article: politicians and regulators have been successful in influencing the remuneration structure, although not their levels. They have pressured to deliver more equity compensation benefits and other long-term instruments. Firms have found other ways to limit the risks that employees take to obtain short-term gains, something required companies that accepted funds from the United States Government during the financial crisis.
As you can read, no matter what make the Government or the poor, or whoever, the rich always find the way to get what they want. Instead of complaining about the remuneration given to the rich, I recommend you follow the old advice if you can not beat them, join them. Getting rich. Becoming rich is the easiest thing in the world. You should only want it, establish an Irresistible goal or a powerful goal along the lines presented by Andrew Corentt in his book the secret of the power of goals. This book will help you become rich, and then the money will flow toward you, as the mountains water flows towards the sea.
In this life every one has what he deserves, the rich have read books and have developed a consciousness of wealth. The poor don’t understand that anyone can remove their right to another. The rich are rich because they read books such as the secret of the power of goals. You read it too and get rich. Work on yourself, creating irresistible targets, and even in times of crisis for the poor and the middle class, you will earn more.
Why no shortage of those who claim its elimination: use proper names of each village (Kiche, Quechua, wedge, Sami, etc.) by eliminating the indigenous concept that generalizes and at the same time destroys our identity, i.e., build a world without indigenous peoples and recognize the names of peoples, as proposed in the conclusions of the meeting project villages indigenous of the Organization International Labour, 1996, in the city of Chimaltenango, Guatemala. The emergence of indigenous peoples as new political actors in the Latin American scenario, with a very particular dynamic as they had not had it during the centuries of Iberian colonialism suffered, is characterized by a set of dynamics that have no other social movements: 1) the claim by its ((((specific rights as indigenous peoples with their culture and their autonomy, 2) the territorialization of its presence, 3) the development of increasingly complex organizational structures, 4) the national dimension of their demands, 5) the relations that are taking their struggles with nation States where they occur. It could be said that it is an order generalized, from Chiapas to the Patagonia, the claim for the recognition of the right to difference, to recognize and respect their ethno-cultural specificity that is not reduced them to some social categories of the dominant capitalist society, as the peasants. Claims more solid and articulated some indigenous movements have been directed towards the approach of plurinational States. This points to the structural modification of the national States born after formal independence from the Spanish Crown in the early 19th century as large estates managed by native aristocracies without own project of nation as it happened, on the contrary, in the nascent American Union in North America, that from the beginning (by eliminating all indigenous peoples, forgive add), was raised as a real political and economic independence. In Latin America, where in general the indigenous peoples with some exceptions where they were virtually disappeared, as in Argentina and Uruguay continued resisting the conquest in a never-ending bid, these new approaches of plurinationality seek effective representation of them in modern Nations; Nations which gives the paradox which, having majorities of indigenous population that might not be totally assimilated or you doblegas, presented by States traced over liberal European models to ignore and marginalize indigenous peoples, States centered on the capital cities and that took the Spanish as an official language, always looking toward Europe or United States abominando of its Aboriginal composition.